Skip to main content

SCAR (Sequence Characterized Amplified Region) Markers


SCAR (Sequence Characterized Amplified Region) Markers 

Introduction


SCAR markers are PCR-based DNA markers derived from RAPD, AFLP, or other random markers.
Developed by Paran and Michelmore in 1993 to convert dominant, less reproducible markers into specific, reproducible, co-dominant markers.
SCAR markers are locus-specific, reproducible, and sequence-characterized, making them ideal for marker-assisted selection (MAS).
Principle
SCAR markers are designed based on known DNA sequences obtained from cloned RAPD/AFLP fragments.
Specific primers (18–24 bp) are synthesized to amplify a single, defined locus.
The PCR amplification of this region generates a distinct band, which is highly reproducible and can distinguish homozygotes from heterozygotes if designed as co-dominant.


Key idea:


Random marker (e.g., RAPD) → Cloning & sequencing → Design specific primers → PCR → SCAR marker
Materials Required
Genomic DNA from the organism
Specific primers (18–24 bp) designed from sequenced fragments
PCR reagents: Taq polymerase, dNTPs, buffer, Mg²⁺
Thermal cycler
Agarose or polyacrylamide gel for PCR product separation
DNA staining dye (ethidium bromide, SYBR Green)


Procedure


Step 1: Identification of a Random Marker
Use RAPD, AFLP, or other markers to find polymorphic fragments linked to a trait or locus of interest.

Step 2: Cloning and Sequencing

Excise the polymorphic fragment from the gel
Clone it into a plasmid vector
Sequence the DNA fragment

Step 3: Primer Design

Design long, specific primers (18–24 nucleotides) flanking the sequenced fragment.
Primers are locus-specific, ensuring specific amplification.

Step 4: PCR Amplification


Set up PCR with genomic DNA, specific primers, Taq polymerase, buffer, and dNTPs
PCR cycles: Standard denaturation, annealing (50–60°C), and extension (72°C)


Step 5: Gel Electrophoresis and Detection


Run PCR products on agarose or polyacrylamide gel
Visualize bands with ethidium bromide or other DNA dye
Presence/absence of expected fragment indicates SCAR marker polymorphism


Diagram in Words


RAPD/AFLP marker → Polymorphic fragment identified
      ↓
Fragment cloning → DNA sequencing
      ↓
Design SCAR primers (18–24 bp)
      ↓
PCR with genomic DNA
      ↓
Specific band detection on gel → Locus-specific marker.



Characteristics of SCAR Markers


Co-dominant or dominant
Locus-specific and reproducible
Sequence-characterized
Based on PCR, no need for restriction digestion or hybridization
Highly reliable for marker-assisted breeding


Merits

Highly reproducible compared to RAPD and AFLP
Locus-specific: Amplifies a single defined DNA fragment
Can be co-dominant, allowing identification of heterozygotes
Useful for MAS, gene mapping, variety identification
PCR-based, fast, and relatively simple


Limitations


Requires initial identification of polymorphic fragment (from RAPD/AFLP)
Sequencing and primer design are labor-intensive
Costlier than simple RAPD markers
Limited by availability of polymorphic sequences linked to trait
Cannot detect random genome-wide variation like RAPD or AFLP


Applications


Marker-Assisted Selection (MAS) in plant and animal breeding
Variety and cultivar identification
Genetic mapping of traits or disease resistance genes
Detection of disease resistance genes in crops
Verification of hybrids and backcross progeny
Can be applied in forensic studies where high specificity is needed



Applications


Genome-wide survey
MAS, gene mapping, hybrid verification
Conclusion
SCAR markers convert random, less reproducible markers into locus-specific, reliable markers.
They are ideal for molecular breeding programs, especially in marker-assisted selection and trait mapping.
Main limitation is the need for sequencing and primer design, but their accuracy and reproducibility make them highly valuable in genetics and breeding.


SCAR Markers – 50 MCQs with Answers




1. SCAR stands for:
A. Sequence Characterized Amplified Region
B. Single Copy Amplified Region
C. Short Conserved Amplified Repeat
D. Specific Cloned Amplified Region
Answer: A


2. SCAR markers are derived from:
A. RFLP fragments
B. RAPD or AFLP fragments
C. SSR sequences
D. Protein markers
Answer: B


3. SCAR markers are:
A. Random markers
B. Locus-specific markers
C. Morphological markers
D. Biochemical markers
Answer: B


4. SCAR markers are usually:
A. Dominant
B. Co-dominant
C. Both dominant and co-dominant
D. Multi-allelic
Answer: C


5. SCAR markers require:
A. No prior DNA sequence info
B. DNA sequence information for primer design
Answer: B


Principle and Procedure
6. SCAR marker principle is based on:
A. Random amplification
B. PCR amplification using specific primers
C. Protein digestion
D. RNA hybridization
Answer: B

7. SCAR primers are typically:
A. 10 nucleotides
B. 18–24 nucleotides
C. 30 nucleotides
D. 50 nucleotides
Answer: B
8. SCAR markers are converted from:
A. Co-dominant markers
B. Dominant markers like RAPD
C. SSR markers
D. RFLP only
Answer: B
9. First step in SCAR marker development is:
A. Design primers
B. Identify polymorphic fragment using RAPD or AFLP
C. PCR amplification
D. Gel electrophoresis
Answer: B
10. SCAR marker PCR is used to:
A. Amplify a specific locus
B. Digest DNA
C. Hybridize RNA
D. Detect proteins
Answer: A
Technical Features
11. SCAR markers are:
A. Highly reproducible
B. Random and unreliable
Answer: A
12. SCAR markers are useful because they are:
A. Locus-specific
B. Genome-wide
Answer: A
13. SCAR markers can distinguish:
A. Homozygotes only
B. Heterozygotes only
C. Both homozygotes and heterozygotes
D. Only dominant alleles
Answer: C
14. SCAR markers require:
A. Restriction digestion
B. DNA cloning and sequencing
C. Southern blotting
D. RNA extraction
Answer: B
15. SCAR markers are:
A. Less reliable than RAPD
B. More reliable and reproducible than RAPD
Answer: B
Advantages
16. SCAR markers are advantageous because:
A. PCR-based
B. Locus-specific
C. Highly reproducible
D. All of the above
Answer: D
17. SCAR markers are used for:
A. Marker-assisted selection
B. Variety identification
C. Hybrid verification
D. All of the above
Answer: D
18. SCAR markers can be:
A. Co-dominant or dominant
B. Only co-dominant
C. Only dominant
Answer: A
19. SCAR markers are better than RAPD because:
A. They are locus-specific
B. Highly reproducible
C. Can identify heterozygotes
D. All of the above
Answer: D
20. SCAR markers are PCR-based, meaning:
A. They require gel electrophoresis only
B. They amplify a specific DNA fragment
C. They detect proteins
D. They digest DNA
Answer: B
Limitations
21. Main limitation of SCAR markers:
A. Random amplification
B. Requires prior sequence info
C. Low reproducibility
D. Cannot detect polymorphism
Answer: B
22. SCAR markers are labor-intensive because:
A. Need cloning and sequencing
B. Require RNA extraction
C. Need protein digestion
D. Only PCR is needed
Answer: A
23. SCAR markers are costlier than:
A. RAPD
B. AFLP
C. SSR
D. Morphological markers
Answer: A
24. SCAR markers cannot detect:
A. Genome-wide variation
B. Trait-specific loci
Answer: A
25. SCAR markers are mainly used for:
A. Random DNA profiling
B. Locus-specific analysis
Answer: B
Applications
26. SCAR markers are widely used for:
A. Marker-assisted selection (MAS)
B. Disease resistance gene identification
C. Hybrid verification
D. All of the above
Answer: D
27. SCAR markers are useful in:
A. Plant breeding
B. Animal breeding
C. Forensic studies
D. All of the above
Answer: D
28. SCAR markers can verify:
A. Varieties and cultivars
B. Phenotypes only
Answer: A
29. SCAR markers are ideal when:
A. High specificity is required
B. Random genome survey is needed
Answer: A
30. SCAR markers are derived from:
A. Cloned polymorphic RAPD fragments
B. Protein markers
C. RNA sequences
D. Random DNA only
Answer: A
Technical Knowledge
31. SCAR primers amplify:
A. Single, defined DNA locus
B. Random fragments
Answer: A
32. SCAR markers are more reproducible than:
A. RAPD
B. AFLP
C. SSR
Answer: A
33. SCAR markers can be:
A. Dominant
B. Co-dominant
C. Either
Answer: C
34. SCAR markers reduce:
A. Randomness of RAPD
B. DNA quality
C. PCR efficiency
Answer: A
35. SCAR markers are developed by:
A. Sequencing RAPD/AFLP fragment → Designing specific primers
B. Random PCR only
C. Protein extraction
D. Southern blotting only
Answer: A
Comparison with RAPD
36. SCAR markers vs RAPD – Reproducibility:
A. Less reproducible
B. More reproducible
Answer: B
37. SCAR markers vs RAPD – Locus specificity:
A. RAPD is locus-specific
B. SCAR is locus-specific
Answer: B
38. SCAR markers vs RAPD – Heterozygote detection:
A. RAPD can detect
B. SCAR can detect (if co-dominant)
Answer: B
39. SCAR markers vs RAPD – PCR primer length:
A. RAPD: 10-mer, SCAR: 18–24-mer
B. Both 10-mer
Answer: A
40. SCAR markers vs RAPD – Use in MAS:
A. Only SCAR suitable
B. Only RAPD suitable
C. Both suitable
Answer: A
Advanced Applications
41. SCAR markers are used in:
A. Detection of disease resistance genes in crops
B. Hybrid verification
C. Variety identification
D. All of the above
Answer: D
42. SCAR markers are PCR-based and:
A. Require restriction digestion
B. Do not require restriction digestion
Answer: B
43. SCAR markers can distinguish:
A. Morphological differences
B. Allelic differences at a locus
Answer: B
44. SCAR markers are:
A. Reproducible and trait-specific
B. Random and unreliable
Answer: A
45. SCAR marker development involves:
A. Cloning → Sequencing → Primer design
B. Direct PCR
Answer: A
Miscellaneous
46. SCAR markers are widely used in:
A. Plant breeding
B. Animal breeding
C. Forensic analysis
D. All of the above
Answer: D
47. SCAR markers are highly suitable for:
A. Trait-linked marker identification
B. Random genome-wide studies
Answer: A
48. SCAR markers can be:
A. Dominant
B. Co-dominant
C. Either
Answer: C
49. SCAR markers are converted from:
A. RAPD or AFLP polymorphic fragments
B. Protein markers
C. SSR
Answer: A
50. SCAR markers are preferred over RAPD because:
A. Highly reproducible
B. Locus-specific
C. Can detect heterozygotes
D. All of the above
Answer: D






Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

AFLP--Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism

AFLP is a PCR-based DNA fingerprinting technique combining restriction digestion and selective PCR amplification of genomic DNA fragments. Developed by Vos et al., 1995. AFLP detects DNA polymorphisms at the genomic level and is highly reproducible and sensitive. Used in genetic mapping, diversity studies, phylogenetics, and marker-assisted selection. Principle AFLP relies on restriction digestion of genomic DNA, followed by ligation of adaptors and PCR amplification of a subset of fragments. Polymorphism arises due to variations in restriction sites, fragment length, insertions, or deletions. Key idea: Restriction digestion → Adaptor ligation → Selective amplification → Gel separation → Detection of polymorphic bands Materials Required Genomic DNA Restriction enzymes (usually EcoRI and MseI) Adaptors complementary to restriction sites PCR reagents: Taq polymerase, dNTPs, buffer, Mg²⁺ Primers complementary to adaptors with selective nucleotides Thermal cycler Polyacrylamide or agarose ...
Post a Comment
Read more

❥ Southern Blotting Notes

Southern Blotting  ❥ 𓆞❥ 𓆞❥ 𓆞❥ 𓆞❥ 𓆞❥ 𓆞❥ 𓆞❥ 𓆞❥ 𓆞❥  Introduction Southern blotting is a molecular biology technique used for the detection of specific DNA sequences in a complex mixture of DNA. It was developed by Edwin M. Southern in 1975. The method involves restriction digestion of DNA, separation by gel electrophoresis, transfer (blotting) onto a membrane, and hybridization with a labeled DNA probe. Principle of Southern Blotting The technique is based on the principle of complementary base pairing. A single-stranded labeled DNA probe hybridizes specifically with its complementary DNA sequence immobilized on a membrane. Detection of the label confirms the presence and size of the target DNA fragment. Steps Involved in Southern Blotting. 1. Isolation of DNA Genomic DNA is extracted from cells or tissues. DNA must be pure and intact to ensure accurate results. 2. Restriction Enzyme  Digestion DNA is digested using specific restriction endonucleases. Produces DNA f...
1 comment
Read more

Secondary Databases (PROSITE, PRINTS, BLOCKS)

Secondary Databases (PROSITE, PRINTS, BLOCKS  Secondary Databases Introduction Biological databases are broadly classified into primary and secondary databases. Primary databases store raw experimental data (e.g., nucleotide or protein sequences), whereas secondary databases contain derived information obtained by analyzing primary sequence data. Secondary databases are mainly used to: Identify protein families Detect conserved motifs, patterns, and domains Predict protein function Study structure–function relationships Examples of secondary databases include PROSITE, PRINTS, BLOCKS, Pfam, etc. 1. PROSITE Database Definition PROSITE is a secondary database that documents protein domains, families, and functional sites in the form of patterns and profiles. Developed by Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB) Maintained along with UniProt Principle PROSITE is based on the idea that functionally important regions of proteins are conserved during evolution. These conserved regions can ...
Post a Comment
Read more

DNA-Mediated Gene Transfer – Detailed Notes

DNA-Mediated Gene Transfer – Detailed Notes 1. Definition DNA-mediated gene transfer refers to the direct introduction of exogenous DNA into a host cell’s genome or cytoplasm without using viral or bacterial vectors. It is a physical or chemical approach to achieve gene delivery. Also called direct gene transfer. 2 . Principle Foreign DNA is delivered into host cells through physical or chemical methods. DNA may integrate into the host genome (stable transformation) or remain episomal (transient expression). Expression depends on: DNA sequence and promoter Type of host cell Delivery efficiency 3. Types of DNA-Mediated Gene Transfer A. Physical Methods These methods use physical forces to introduce DNA into cells. Microinjection DNA is injected directly into the nucleus or cytoplasm using a glass micropipette. Used in: animal embryos, oocytes, plant protoplasts Advantages: Precise, can deliver large DNA fragments Limitations: Labor-intensive, requires specialized equipment, low throughp...
Post a Comment
Read more

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) – Detailed Notes

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) – Detailed Notes 1. Definition SNPs are single base-pair variations in the DNA sequence that occur at a specific position in the genome among individuals of a species. Example: At a specific locus, one individual may have A while another has G: Copy code Individual 1: …A T C G A T…   Individual 2: …A T C G G T… SNPs are the most common type of genetic variation in most organisms. 2. Characteristics of SNPs Single base change: Involves substitution of one nucleotide for another (A↔G, C↔T). Biallelic nature: Most SNPs have only two alleles in a population. Widespread in the genome: Found in coding regions (exons), non-coding regions (introns, promoters, intergenic regions). Stable inheritance: Passed from generation to generation like other genetic markers. Frequency: Occur approximately every 100–300 bp in the human genome. 3 . Types of SNPs SNPs are categorized based on location or effect on gene function: A. Based on genomic location Cod...
Post a Comment
Read more

SSR (Simple Sequence Repeat) Marker

SSR (Simple Sequence Repeat) Markers – Detailed Notes Introduction SSR markers, also called microsatellites, are short tandem repeats (1–6 bp) of DNA sequences found throughout the genome. Examples: (A)n, (CA)n, (GATA)n, where n is the number of repeat units. SSRs are highly polymorphic, co-dominant, and locus-specific, widely used in genetic mapping, variety identification, population genetics, and marker-assisted selection (MAS). SSRs are similar to STRs; in plants and animals, the term SSR is more commonly used in molecular breeding, while STR is used more in forensics and human genetics. Structure of SSR Repeat motif: 1–6 bp Number of repeats: Variable among individuals → basis of polymorphism Flanking regions: Conserved sequences used to design specific PCR primers SSR loci are generally abundant in non-coding regions, though some occur in genes. Principle SSR markers exploit variation in the number of repeat units at a specific locus. PCR amplification using primers flanking the...
Post a Comment
Read more

Protein Structure Database (PDB)

Protein Structure Database (PDB) Introduction The Protein Structure Database (PDB) is the primary global repository for the three-dimensional (3D) structures of biological macromolecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, and protein–ligand complexes. These structures are determined experimentally using techniques like X-ray crystallography, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM). PDB plays a vital role in understanding: Protein structure and function Molecular interactions Drug discovery and design Structural biology and bioinformatics History and Development Established in 1971 Founded by Brookhaven National Laboratory (USA) Initially contained only 7 protein structures Now maintained by the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) Members of wwPDB RCSB PDB (USA) PDBe (Europe) PDBj (Japan) BMRB (Biological Magnetic Resonance Data Bank) Objectives of PDB To collect, store, and distribute 3D structural data of biomolecules To provide free and ope...
Post a Comment
Read more

GEL RETARDATION ANALYSIS

GEL RETARDATION ANALYSIS (EMSA – Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay) Introduction Gel retardation analysis, also known as Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA), is a widely used in vitro technique for studying DNA–protein and RNA–protein interactions. The method is based on the observation that a DNA–protein complex migrates more slowly than free DNA during non-denaturing gel electrophoresis, resulting in a mobility shift or “retardation”. EMSA is extensively used to study transcription factor binding, regulatory DNA elements, and binding specificity. Definition Gel retardation analysis (EMSA) is a technique used to detect and analyze binding interactions between nucleic acids and proteins by observing the reduced electrophoretic mobility of nucleic acid–protein complexes compared to free nucleic acids. Principle A labeled DNA or RNA probe is incubated with a specific binding protein. When binding occurs, a nucleic acid–protein complex is formed. This complex has a larger size ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Agrobacterium & CaMV-Mediated Gene Transfer –

Agrobacterium and CaMV-Mediated Gene Transfer – Detailed Notes 1. Introduction Gene transfer in plants is often achieved by exploiting natural genetic mechanisms of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (CaMV). These systems allow stable introduction of foreign genes into plant genomes for transgenic plant development. 2. Agrobacterium-Mediated Gene Transfer 2.1 Definition Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer uses the natural ability of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, a soil bacterium, to transfer a part of its DNA (T-DNA) into plant cells. T-DNA integrates into the plant nuclear genome, enabling stable transformation. 2.2 Mechanism Recognition and attachment Agrobacterium detects phenolic compounds secreted by wounded plant cells. These compounds activate virulence (vir) genes on the Ti (tumor-inducing) plasmid. Activation of vir genes VirA (sensor kinase) and VirG (response regulator) induce expression of other vir genes (VirB, VirC, VirD, VirE). T-DNA processing and tran...
Post a Comment
Read more